Log in

View Full Version : Windows 7's Expanded Video Format Support Rocks!


Jason Dunn
09-24-2009, 05:30 PM
<p><img src="http://images.thoughtsmedia.com//dht/auto/1253807886.usr1.png" style="border: 0; float: left; margin: 10px;" />I'm slowly but surely migrating my computers from Windows Vista to Windows 7, and one of the things that is impressing me more and more as I use it is the expanded video codec support. With Windows Vista, one of the first programs I'd install would be <a href="http://www.videolan.org/vlc/" target="_blank">VLC Media Player</a> because Vista was incapable of playing pretty much anything but WMV and AVI files. With Windows 7, I chose not to install it because I wanted to see how good the new MPEG4/h.264 support was. In a word? Great! Going through my archive of old video files, which are in a variety of formats (AVI, WMV, h.264/MPEG4, AVI Divx), it looks like the only videos that won't play with Windows Media Player are some old-school Quicktime MOV files. No big loss there.</p><p>On to today's task: I had downloaded a video in XVID format and I wanted to burn it to a DVD for my wife to watch. The first thing that impressed me was that Windows Media Player 12 on Windows 7 was able to play this XVID file just as easily as it would play a WMV file. That's exactly how it's supposed to work. We should have had support like this in Vista, but Microsoft didn't seem to want to invest in the codecs - thankfully that has changed with Windows 7. Taking this XVID file, I loaded it into Windows DVD Maker, and it burned a DVD. That sort of smooth "A to B" task has sometimes been difficult on previous versions of Windows, so I'm impressed that Windows 7 finally gets it right. <MORE /></p><p>I'm less impressed with Windows DVD Maker itself though. First, it barely used more than 20% of my Core i920 CPU (four cores, eight threads) when doing the transcode from XVID to MPEG2. Of all the applications on Windows 7 that you want to be multi-core smart, Windows DVD Maker should be at the top of that list. Second, even though the XVID file was a 16:9 aspect ratio file, Windows DVD Maker created a 4:3 disc, regardless of whether or not I had it set to 16:9 or 4:3. I'm not sure why it was so dysfunctional - I'll have to test it with another video file.</p><p>So while Windows DVD Maker looks like it needs some work, the expanded codec support in Windows 7 rocks. Good job Microsoft!</p>

Damion Chaplin
09-24-2009, 09:54 PM
Well, thank the lords of Kobol!
You know how annoying it was to have to tell a friend or family member that their new PC won't play their videos until they download an extra piece of software?
What am I saying? Of course you do! ;)

Stinger
09-24-2009, 10:47 PM
That's excellent news.

I tried to edit a video file I'd taken with my phone in Windows Movie Maker and was shocked that the codec wasn't supported.

I can't wait for my pre-ordered copy of Windows 7 to arrive. :)

ptyork
09-25-2009, 01:33 AM
There's no doubt that the native container support is greatly expanded. However, the codecs are still lacking somewhat. I still had to install the Shark007 codecs to get some of my videos working and I still have some (3GP/3G2) that only play video--no audio--and others (some MOV) that only play audio. I'm 90% happy, but since these are legacy files (and thus old memories), I'm disappointed to see support lost. Of course, I've got the technical wherewithal to find the right codecs (I hope) and re-encode them, so it's no big deal. Just a little disappointing since I know that so many can't/don't.

Jason Dunn
09-25-2009, 07:06 PM
I still had to install the Shark007 codecs to get some of my videos working and I still have some (3GP/3G2) that only play video--no audio--and others (some MOV) that only play audio. I'm 90% happy...

There were so many different video codecs floating around going back a few years before most people standardized on a few key formats, so I'm not surprised that Microsoft won't/can't support everything under the sun. It would just be too hard/expensive.