True specs on hp 6315 camara ???

[q-live]

Can everybody tell me what do you think of your hp 6315 camara...........i have been fooling around with the camara latley and i was wondering if its even a full mega pixel ???? also is it me or does it seems a little dark sometimes even in a lit room???? i notice even something new i didnt see about when i hit the big button up and down somehting called " compesentation exposure " comes up..... what is it for ?????

[Paladin27]

It's not a megapixel. It's 640x480. What's that... 0.3 megapixel I believe.

[q-live]

dam thats stupid.... how u gonna put something like that out..... what would it had of tooken for them to put a 1.2 on there.... hell they got zoom but it needs to be better zoom

[Jason Dunn]

Can everybody tell me what do you think of your hp 6315 camara...........i have been fooling around with the camara latley and i was wondering if its even a full mega pixel ???? also is it me or does it seems a little dark sometimes even in a lit room???? i notice even something new i didnt see about when i hit the big button up and down somehting called " compesentation exposure " comes up..... what is it for ?????

Repeat after me: "Cameras in phones and PDAs generally suck". :wink:

[q-live]

ahahahahahah yea but it dont have to seem that way..... also where did you find the info for the cam specs

[Dolphin]

Can everybody tell me what do you think of your hp 6315 camera...........i have been fooling around with the camera lately and i was wondering if its even a full mega pixel ???? also is it me or does it seems a little dark sometimes even in a lit room???? i notice even something new i didn’t see about when i hit the big button up and down something called " compesentation exposure " comes up..... what is it for ?????

Repeat after me: "Cameras in phones and PDAs generally suck". :wink:

I took the 6315 back because the cam was very disappointing. I now have a rx3715 which is less disappointing... getting better!

[Dolphin]

Repeat after me: "Cameras in phones and PDAs generally suck". :wink:


But some are better than others.

iPaq 6315 photo...

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v164/toddsmith/snap0023432x324jpg.jpg




iPaq rx3700 photo...

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v164/toddsmith/HPIM00164x6.jpg

As it's been said before... don't throw away you dedicated digital camera just yet!

But I am much more pleased with the cam on the rx3700 than the 6315!

IMHO... any camera is better than no camera. Just don't expect to get ccd quality from a cmos cam.

[Kati Compton]

Yeah - the examples I've seen from one of those two devices are among the better embedded pics I've seen. Usually camera/PDA phones make part of the picture reddish, and the whole picture grainy.

From the above pictures I'll guess it's the 3700.

[Dolphin]

From the above pictures I'll guess it's the 3700.

Kati... just in case you might have been confused about the above pictures. The top one is from a 6315 (vga) and the bottom is from a 3700 (1.3mp.)

As you can see the colors and consistency of the 3700 are much better than the 6315... it's more than just the resolution. But I believe they are both just cmos sensors not ccd sensors as with most dedicated digital cameras.