Log in

View Full Version : Sending an email? Did you buy your stamps?


sublime
03-06-2004, 08:58 PM
Good ole Billy Gates

http://www.cnn.com/2004/TECH/internet/03/05/spam.charge.ap/index.html

David Prahl
03-06-2004, 09:07 PM
Actually I'm sharing stamps with 2.2 million other people.

I can see it now:

Download Warez, Serialz, and Stampz here!

JustinGTP
03-09-2004, 04:58 AM
Too true David!

And it is not like we don't pay already to get onto the internet!

dean_shan
03-11-2004, 05:54 AM
Too true David!

And it is not like we don't pay already to get onto the internet!

How true. I'll deal with spam before I spend money for each message.

Janak Parekh
03-11-2004, 05:59 AM
How true. I'll deal with spam before I spend money for each message.
Maybe. Fast forward 10 years. At the rate spam is growing, it'll be 99.9% of all email. Imagine getting a 100-1 spam-to-real-email ratio. 8O

--janak

dean_shan
03-11-2004, 06:00 AM
I must be a rare case. I get about maybe 5 spam messages max a week.

Janak Parekh
03-11-2004, 06:04 AM
I must be a rare case. I get about maybe 5 spam messages max a week.
I used to. But a few of my email addresses finally appeared on some spammer's list. :| Keep your name off every site, and you'll do fine. :)

--janak

sublime
03-12-2004, 11:04 PM
Isn't the whole point of this a solution for spam? Companies won't be able to afford to flood our inboxes anymore. I figure that I'd much rather pay small prices for email stamps than get shotty software that doesn't block spam worth a damn.

Janak Parekh
03-12-2004, 11:36 PM
Isn't the whole point of this a solution for spam? Companies won't be able to afford to flood our inboxes anymore. I figure that I'd much rather pay small prices for email stamps than get shotty software that doesn't block spam worth a damn.
While some spamblocking software actually works quite well, yes -- this is one possible way of overhauling SMTP so that the cost burden is not on the recipient (as it is now) but rather on the sender.

--janak

Falstaff
03-13-2004, 12:19 AM
How true. I'll deal with spam before I spend money for each message.
Maybe. Fast forward 10 years. At the rate spam is growing, it'll be 99.9% of all email. Imagine getting a 100-1 spam-to-real-email ratio. 8O

--janak

Uhhh... I already get a roughly 50-75 : 1 ratio.... Outlook filters it out so that in my inbox I only get a 4 or 5 : 1 ratio.

ale2999
03-13-2004, 05:38 PM
spam LOL.
i think that lately the hotmail spam filter got a WHOLE lot better as It catche 95% of the spam. so no problem there.

My isp is telus and they are using the most awesome server side spam filter. so no problem there either.
to whoever get lots, have fun :D