Official Motorola MPx Photos

[Jason Dunn]

<div class='os_post_top_link'><a href='http://www.motorola.com/mediacenter/graphics/list/0,,4253,00.html' target='_blank'>http://www.motorola.com/mediacenter...0,,4253,00.html</a><br /><br /></div>These aren't different than the pictures that have been floating around over the past week or so, but they're high resolution and 100% official, so go take a look. ;-)<br /><br /><img src="http://www.pocketpcthoughts.com/images/web/2003/4006_MotImage.jpg" />

[Jason Dunn]

Revel in the high-res glory of this one:

http://a508.g.akamai.net/7/508/787/20040223174301/www.motorola.com/mot/image/4/4008_MotImage.jpg

:mrgreen:

[JonnoB]

The slot I thought was SD is actually the charger/data port. Most Motorola phones have the exact same port. You can clearly see the connector in the picture Jason linked to. Has anyone seen dimmensions yet? The device looks pretty darn small in a person's hands (at least compared to other PPCPE devices!!)

[Macguy59]

It's probably just me but the button layout doesn't look the same as in the other pics I've seen :?:

[JonnoB]

It's probably just me but the button layout doesn't look the same as in the other pics I've seen :?:

I am sure the earlier pics were all from prototypes. The new layout adds a lot more. Seems very busy/cluttered, but I am sure that Moto spent the time testing out many form factors and layouts and determined this to be the best. At high-res, you can see the buttons look like little see-through chicklet style buttons. I only wish these were available sooner than second half 2004!

[JustinGTP]

Wow! Is it just me, but is anyone else in love with the MPx100? It seems chunky and holdable :D

I like the look and the screen, I especially like that it is black - I do hope Tek 'n Toys will sell this phone :D

-Justin.

[huangzhinong]

Using photoshop measurement tools, the dimension of this unit is:3.5 x 2.3 x 0.98 inch, for comparsion, h1945 is 4.46 x 2.75 x 0.5 in

[msprague]

According to Arne's report (http://www.ppcw.net/index.php?itemid=1812) it has consumer infrared as well! :mrgreen:

[Prevost]

Are there photos of it fully opened?

[JonnoB]

Are there photos of it fully opened?

The best close-up shots I have seen on the non-prototype stills were the ones Arne took at the conference. See the two links on this page (http://www.ppcw.net/images/live/3gsm/).

[rlobrecht]

I like this one. http://www.motorola.com/mediacenter/graphics/detail/0,,3334_4253,00.html

Throw that stylus into remind us its a PPCPE and not a smartphone!

[limit]

is there an actual size comparison between 3.5 and 2.8 LCD.

[Jonathon Watkins]

is there an actual size comparison between 3.5 and 2.8 LCD.

Yes, one is 3.5 inches diagonally, the other is 2.8 inches diagonally. :wink: I understand that there are devices call 'rulers' that show the difference. :lol:

Could you clarify the question please? :)

[yslee]

Heh, from the PPCW.net photos, anyone notice the date on the screen? Tuesday, 1st April, 2003. Hope it's not a sign of a joke. =P

[JonnoB]

Heh, from the PPCW.net photos, anyone notice the date on the screen? Tuesday, 1st April, 2003. Hope it's not a sign of a joke. =P

It is a mock-up screen inserted via photshop or the 2003 OS installed, but date not updated. Those kinds of things I would not worry about.

[denethor]

Using photoshop measurement tools, the dimension of this unit is:3.5 x 2.3 x 0.98 inch, for comparsion, h1945 is 4.46 x 2.75 x 0.5 in

for comparsion MPx200 is

89mm x 48mm x 27mm
1.89 x 3.5 x 1.06 in (h x w x d)

[maikii]

but no text explaining what the photos are, not even the name mpx220, the photos are just labeled mpx.

Is there an article somewhere on the site that I missed?

[JonnoB]

but no text explaining what the photos are, not even the name mpx220, the photos are just labeled mpx.

Is there an article somewhere on the site that I missed?

This is not the 220, this is the 300... but looks to be branded as just 'MPx'
There has not been any official mention of the 220 as of yet that I am aware of.

[limit]

is there an actual size comparison between 3.5 and 2.8 LCD.

Yes, one is 3.5 inches diagonally, the other is 2.8 inches diagonally. :wink: I understand that there are devices call 'rulers' that show the difference. :lol:

Could you clarify the question please? :)

something like, a side by side comparison between the two LCD size, some screen shoots to compare with