ShivShanks
01-02-2003, 08:05 PM
Well if you read the comments that Paul Thurrot of WinInfo has been making about the Sendo/MS issue -
http://www.wininformant.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=37507
Also read the comments -
http://www.wininformant.com/Articles/Index.cfm?Action=Comments&ArticleID=37507
Now I'd really like to know why is it that Paul is convinced that MS is guilty? I thought in this country it was "Not Guilty Until Proven" ... Or could it be that Paul is hearing only the Sendo side of the story and obviously being biased? High time someone came up with a more objective analysis of the situation.
http://www.wininformant.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=37507
Also read the comments -
http://www.wininformant.com/Articles/Index.cfm?Action=Comments&ArticleID=37507
Now I'd really like to know why is it that Paul is convinced that MS is guilty? I thought in this country it was "Not Guilty Until Proven" ... Or could it be that Paul is hearing only the Sendo side of the story and obviously being biased? High time someone came up with a more objective analysis of the situation.