Log in

View Full Version : Framed in Bluetooth: The Parrot Photo Viewer Reviewed


Vincent Ferrari
03-05-2007, 04:00 PM
<img src="http://www.digitalmediathoughts.com/images/ferrari_parrot_0.jpg" /><br /><br /><b>Product Category:</b> Digital Photo Frame<br /><b>Manufacturer:</b> <a href="http://www.parrot.biz/usa/products/parrotphotoviewer3.5">Parrot</a><br /><b>Where to Buy:</b> <a href="http://www.parrot.biz/usa/wheretobuy">Various Online Retailers</a><br /><b>Price:</b> $169.99 USD<br /><b>System Requirements:</b> A Bluetooth device for sending pictures to the frame.<br /><b>Specifications:</b> Provided Below<br /><br /><b>Pros</b><li> Very easy to use;<br /><li> Pictures transfer quickly;<br /><li> Uses Bluetooth instead of a cable;<br /><li> Doesn't require a PC;<b>Cons</b><li> Contrast is a bit weak and brightness is a bit dim;<br /><li> Display is only 320 x 234<b>Summary</b><br />Parrot is a company known for its Bluetooth accessories. Can a company that makes interesting hands free kits produce a product that will convince people to do more with their digital photos than leave them locked up in a computer or camera phone?<br /><br />Read on for the full review!<!><br /><PAGEBREAK><br /><span><b>Detailed Specs.</b></span><br />Direct from Parrot's website:<li> High-resolution LCD TFT screen with 320 x 234 pixels<br /><li> 262,144 colour display<br /><li> Effective LCD size: 3.5 inches<br /><li> Built-in light sensor<br /><li> Compatible image format: JPEG (700 K to 7 M pixels)<br /><li> 32 MB internal memory for storing over 100 photos<br /><li> Portrait or landscape position sensor<br /><li> Automatic image resizing<br /><li> Menus: Slideshow, Picture, Delete, Reposition, Language<br /><li> Fitting: free-standing or wall-mounted<br /><li> Power lead<br /><li> Frame: white-leaded oak or leather (depending on model)<br />Bluetooth<li> Built-in Bluetooth receiver<br /><li> Bluetooth version 1.2<br /><li> Bluetooth profiles supported: FTP, OPP and BIP<br /><li> Receives pictures from up to 10 metres away<br /><li> Pairing: not required with this product<br /><li> Software updates by Bluetooth<br />Dimensions and Weight<br /><li> Width: 8.6 cm<br /><li> Height: 10.6 cm<br /><li> Depth: 1.5 cm<br /><li> Weight: 260 g (not incl. frame)<br />Processor<li> ARM 9 + 64 MB SDRAM<br /><li> Storage memory: 32 MB NAND Flash<br />What's in the box?<li> The frame itself.<br /><li> A power adapter.<br /><li> A metal rod that gets screwed in the back of the frame for desk/table displaying.<br /><li> A wall bracket.<br /><li> A user guide.<br /><li> A Parrot product guide.<br /><PAGEBREAK><br /><span><b>First Impressions</b></span><br />I was sitting at my desk and the General Manager of my company plopped down the Parrot Photo Viewer in front of me. He told me he would be coming back later to discuss it with me, and he wanted to know what I thought. Being the local uber geek in my office and the understood digital media guru, things like this happen to me all the time. My first reaction was, "Parrot? Who wants a photoframe from them?" I opened the box and I was pleasantly surprised with what was inside.<br /><br /><img src="http://www.digitalmediathoughts.com/images/ferrari_parrot_1.jpg" /><br /><i>Figure 1: The grand unveiling. Parrot did do a very nice job with the packaging.</i><br /><br />Sitting, nestled all snug inside was the "Brown Salamander" version of a digital photo frame. It's hard to describe the pattern, but it slightly resembles snakeskin and despite its leathery appearance, it's not soft. A run of stitching around the outer edge of the frame really does set off the rest. Overall, it looks like it could be in a nice room and blend.<br /><br /><img src="http://www.digitalmediathoughts.com/images/ferrari_parrot_2.jpg" /><br /><i>Figure 2: A close up of the texture of the Parrot Photo Viewer.</i><br /><br />That being said, there are some weird design choices that were made. For example, the cable that carries power to the unit (no batteries here, folks) is bright iPod white. On it is a slight bulge with a power button. Considering the dark and elegant design of the frame itself, the white power cable and adapter seems out of place and is aesthetically a poor design choice.<br /><br /><img src="http://www.digitalmediathoughts.com/images/ferrari_parrot_3.jpg" /><br /><i>Figure 3: The power button is the model of simplicity.</i><br /><br />It's possible to tuck the power cable away neatly if you're using the Photo Viewer on a desk, but if you're hanging it on a wall, it's something you should be aware of.<br /><PAGEBREAK><br /><span><b>How Well Does It Work?</b></span><br />Honestly, I wasn't expecting much. I figured this was just another gimmick and another company's entrance into the world of convergence. I was pleasantly surprised when my Bluetooth desktop PC was able to detect the Photo Viewer immediately and transferred an 8 megapixel picture in a few seconds. While the version of Bluetooth the frame supports is only 1.2, the speed is more than acceptable. The Photo Viewer gives you a real time representation of the picture being sent to the frame and the photo is drawn line by line as the picture is transferred.<br /><br />Overall, it's quick and painless.<br /><br />From my BlackBerry Pearl, things were only slightly more complex. Instead of just being able to send without pairing, I did have to pair my phone to the Photo Viewer. As soon as I did, the photos were flying over immediately. The take away, though, is that your results will vary with your phone and how much your carrier locks down things like Bluetooth file transfer. We were still able to transfer from all the phones we tried with it (Including a BlackBerry Pearl, Motorola Razrs, a Samsung Trace, and a SonyEricsson K750), so I wouldn' t call this too big a bug, just something you should know about.<br /><br />Either way, Parrot earns themselves a big pat on the back for ease of use. I was expecting the software to be balky and glitchy, and instead found it to be nearly transparent to use; the hiccups, glitches, and weirdness were all to be blamed on the phone manufacturers themselves, not the frame.<br /><br />Navigating the menu system is as simple as using the three buttons on the rear of the unit. There's a left arrow, a right arrow, and a center action button. To bring up the menu, press the center button, and then you can navigate through the options using the left and right arrow buttons.<br /><br /><img src="http://www.digitalmediathoughts.com/images/ferrari_parrot_4.jpg" /><br /><i>Figure 4: The buttons on the back of the Parrot Photo Viewer.</i><br /><br /><img src="http://www.digitalmediathoughts.com/images/ferrari_parrot_5.jpg" /><br /><i>Figure 5: The menus of the Parrot Photo Viewer.</i><br /><br />The menus are logically arranged and the icons make sense for their function. You can rotate the picture left or right, set up your slideshow, delete a picture, undelete a picture (handy if you goof!) <br /><PAGEBREAK><br /><span><b>How Will My Photos Look?</b></span><br />Again, this is an area where Parrot exceeded my expectations. The specs for the screen are relatively low. It only displays 262,144 colors and has a maximum resolution of 320 x 234 which is actually lower than the resolution on many Windows Mobile handhelds.<br /><br /><img src="http://www.digitalmediathoughts.com/images/ferrari_parrot_6.jpg" /><br /><i>Figure 6: Picture quality was good, brightness wasn't the best although passable, and contrast could've been better but it was still good.</i><br /><br />Despite this, the pixelation isn't terrible, and the screen's brightness is adequate for display even in a well lit room. I would've been happier with a hair more contrast, but that might just be a personal preference on my part. Overall, it's not "knock your socks off" good, but it's definitely good enough for displaying a few snapshots in a slideshow. I would have liked a glossy screen similar to the ones in newer laptops seeing as those types of screens enhance contrast in general.<br /><br />Parrot also makes a 7" version with a 720 x 480 screen, which might be more to your liking if you intend on using it for more than just camera phone snapshots.<br /><br /><span><b>The Final Word</b></span><br />I was prepared to be unimpressed, and was pleasantly surprised. I had no trouble with other phones and my Bluetooth desktop PC. Even though I only had the 3.5" version, I could see myself using something like this in the future. It was easy, the pictures looked good, and everything worked as advertised. In reality, there aren't a whole lot of tech products out there that can stake that claim.<br /><br />I'd definitely recommend trying to get a demonstration of it before buying just to make sure the screen looks good enough for you and the size is right. If not, consider the 7" model which has much more memory and a screen that's more than twice the resolution.<br /><br /><i>Vincent M. Ferrari is a blogger, photographer wannabe, digital media junkie, and Apple fanboy from the Bronx, New York. His most famous accomplishment is canceling his AOL account which got him an inordinate amount of fame, something he still brags about to all his friends. When he's not taking down multi-billion dollar corporations, he's writing on his <a href="http://www.insignificantthoughts.com">own blog</a>, <a href="http://www.theaterofmymind.com">taking photos</a>, and working as a Producer for the <a href="http://www.ilifezone.com">iLifeZone</a> podcast.</i>

randalllewis
03-06-2007, 04:20 AM
Someone will come up with the right design and winning price point for these frames soon. I would own one- when that sweet spot of function and price is delivered. I don't understand why the frames are so expensive, as I just saw a 15 inch computer LCD for $149 US today with far better resolution than this product. The ideal frame should cost around 75-100 USD, by equivalent to a 5X7 picture, have power options of USB so I could run it in from my computer, battery or AC. It needs to have a multi-card reader and remote control would be a topper. It should come in various designs to satisfy various tastes. It seems manufacturers are getting close, but no one has done it yet.

Jason Dunn
03-06-2007, 03:46 PM
Someone will come up with the right design and winning price point for these frames soon. I would own one- when that sweet spot of function and price is delivered. I don't understand why the frames are so expensive, as I just saw a 15 inch computer LCD for $149 US today with far better resolution than this product.

I agree - it's baffling that I can buy HUGE high-quality LCD screens for cheap, yet these little picture frames are so expensive. Although perhaps that's part of the problem - maybe there are so few places making small LCD screens that the cost has been driven up. I saw some screens at CES that were big but still inexpensive.

Vincent Ferrari
03-06-2007, 04:10 PM
Just to add to Randall's thought, I think it should also have an integrated coffee maker.

Seriously, though, I think the cost of these frames is coming from two things.

1. Very little demand for them.
2. The cost of smaller LCD's (You are correct, Jason, smaller LCD's are much more expensive to produce).

The truth of the matter is that these frames are really geared toward the non-geeky mom and pop crowd who want their frame to just work. Once you start adding all the other features (card readers, batteries, wifi, coffee maker) you start moving it out of the range of the "I just want it to work" crowd. While $169 may seem like a lot, it's nothing compared to what companies would charge if they make a swiss army knife device.

On a different note, has any swiss army type device ever done everything well? I mean, if you add a card reader you're looking at having to do file management. If you're adding everything, something takes a hit. As it is, this device does what it does very well. Pictures transfer quickly and easily, the "OS" is very easy to use, and the screen is decent quality.

All in all, I'd say that's good enough to justify the cost which will invariably come down seeing as this is a relatively new item.

Jason Dunn
03-06-2007, 04:22 PM
Once you start adding all the other features (card readers, batteries, wifi, coffee maker) you start moving it out of the range of the "I just want it to work" crowd. While $169 may seem like a lot, it's nothing compared to what companies would charge if they make a swiss army knife device.

Ah yes, the old "accept things as they are given to you and don't ask questions". Spoken like a Mac user! :twisted: :lol:

There are ways to add features without adding complexity. Adding a card reader would not necessarily add complexity if it was implemented in the right way. Most of the frames I've seen DO have card readers, and they work as simply as:

1) You put in the card
2) It displays pictures of the card

It's not rocket science. My dad has a picture frame that works that way. Hell man, Bluetooth is much more complicated for most people than putting a memory card in a slot. ;-)

Vincent Ferrari
03-06-2007, 04:29 PM
Ahhh the old "Let's give the user 300 ways to do something and make something 20x more complicated than it is."

Working for Ballmer, Mr. Dunn? :P

I'm only saying that the more features you introduce to something the more complicated it becomes. If you add a card reader, well you just told people they either need to buy another card or sacrifice the one already in their cam. If you want them to be able to copy the files from the card to the frame, you now have to give people file management capabilities, lest they just continuously overwrite or bloat up their frame.

I'm not saying more features wouldn't be nice, but I don't see a tremendous demand for do it all picture frames. The problem that's holding these frames back from selling isn't the feature set, it's the cost, and that's going to come down with increased adoption. Adding more features isn't going to make them more appealing. Even the most feature-rich frames I've seen from Ceiva (brilliant products, by the way) are WAY more expensive and aren't selling anywhere near the cheaper ones you'd find at Linens N Things.

Right now, I think these frames are a solution seeking a problem. I have a feeling, though, that that's going to change over the next few years and we'll see a lot more of these in a lot more homes and costing a lot less money.