View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 10-23-2009, 10:04 PM
Phillip Dyson
Mystic
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,520

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adam Krebs View Post
Well, it wasn't *all* horrible. A lot of the advances that we can enjoy (like a re-written desktop window manager) mean that we get live thumbnail previews of running applications, and UAC has resulted in a much safer OS. I think a lot of the good stuff was lost in the reviews and subsequent Vista bashing. That said, there wasn't a whole lot of readily apparent feature reasons to jump to Vista in the first place. A lot of it was under the hood stuff.
Agreed. My thought was that it was wise to seperate Vista from 7. Let Vista take the lumps during the transition and make a triumphant return with 7.

I'm not saying Microsoft planned to fail, but as a software developer, I understand that making a radical architectural change will have its pain points during the transition. No matter how well you plan. Vista became the sacrificial lamb and 7 was the resurrected savior.

They got to seperate restructuring and the value add from a customer perception perspective.
__________________

Phone: Nexus one Backup Phone: AT&T Samsung Jack; Future Phone: I'm Watching WP7; Media Player: Platinum Zune HD 32GB; Home Server: HP MediaSmart Server LX195 Console: XBox 360, PS3, Wii
 
Reply With Quote