View Single Post
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 07-01-2009, 04:06 PM
Vincent Ferrari
Executive Editor Emeritus
Vincent Ferrari's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 849
Send a message via AIM to Vincent Ferrari Send a message via Skype™ to Vincent Ferrari

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hooch Tan View Post
The market must be limited though, since I imagine this would only be preferred by those with limited or no Internet access since streaming solutions provide a comparable service.
Wow, why would you assume that? Doogald gives good reasons, but I can think of one that no one EVER talks about when talking about the demise of TV:

SPORTS and Live Events

It's all well and good to maybe catch something on Hulu or TV.com a day or two after it airs, but I watch most of my stuff at different times on air day. For Sports, well, you're pretty much screwed no matter what.

For example, I'm a Mets fan. The Mets are available on MLB.tv HD (nice) however, not to me since I live in NYC (FAIL!).

Another thing you aren't considering is that the cable companies will have much lower costs as they won't have to keep replacing dead DVRs (I'm on DVR #2 at the moment) AND if my DVR goes to the great DVR in the sky, my shows don't go with it. I'm very cool with that.

I'm a happy Cablevision customer and this can't get to me fast enough. As far as it being locked to Cablevision, well, it's up to them because they invented it. If another company wants to take a stab at it, go right ahead, but nothing says that Cablevision has to share what they've created.
__________________
Current Apple Stuff: 2008 MacBook Pro 15.4", iPhone 3Gs (32gb), AppleTV, 4gb Shuffle.
 
Reply With Quote