Quote:
Originally Posted by rkistler
But each time someone changes devices is another time they have the choice to move to a different OS - which DOES hurt MS (in this example).
|
That sums up the absurdity of the MSFT model better than it may first appear. See, the problem is that the carrier's and OS developer's interests are NOT ALIGNED like they are with Apple. The carrier likes to sell you a new phone and extend your contract for 2 years; MSFT on the other hand, would like you to stay put with their platform - but can't force the carrier to provide the update - and why would a carrier choose to do that over locking you in for another 2 years with a new device with any OS?
The carriers complain about the "ecosystem" being too large and complicated (4 platforms for smartphones) and yet their very own business model perpetuates it! The system is geared for customers to switch among devices and carriers.
I think the answer is going to eventually come when the government restricts the hardware & network tie-ins. Then consumer choice and preference will drive adoption, not coercive carrier contracts, etc. At that point MSFT can work with hardware providers to deliver a sustainable and competitive OS.