View Single Post
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 11-10-2003, 07:12 PM
trachy
Thinker
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 361

Quote:
Originally Posted by Janak Parekh
Quote:
Originally Posted by trachy
$400 after committing to a 2-year contract?!? Yeah, that's a sure-fire way to get market penetration for a new product. Way to go, imbeciles.
Verizon is typically expensive for any of their new smart devices, be they Palm, Windows Mobile, or anything else. After all, the 7135 is still listed for $500 with a 2-year contract, and the i700 is $600.

BTW, that doesn't necessarily make them "imbeciles"...
I understand that as a voice of Thoughts you probaby want to distance yourself from Verizon criticism, but -- c'mon! Justifying this highway robbery with the argument that they've always been expensive is absurd. It might be a valid argument if the market set that $400 price tag, but AT&T and Motorola have clearly shown that not to be the case.

I don't usually resort to name calling, but whomever makes the pricing decisions at Verizon is an imbecile in my book. Frankly, I'm a little surprised MS and/or Samsung haven't dropped the hammer on them yet.
 
Reply With Quote