Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Paragon
...I always thought that in order to prove liability one had to show a true loss at least based on potential income. For NTP to have a potential loss of income they should have to show real proof of intent to implement their patent. If they could show they had a workable plan to put their patents into service in some way that would come close to rivaling what RIM have done, then I would say they deserve a financial reward...Dave
|
I agree with you on this but my question is what gives another company the right to use someone's patent? I agree with the liability part you mention but I would imagine that NTP is at least entitled to a licensing fee for the use of their technology.
Jeff-