As soon as I've read it, I smelt BS.
So:
The study was funded by, among others, Orange, O2, T-Mobile, Vodafone, the Mobile Manufacturers Forum, and the GSM Association.
Furthermore: it's already been criticised in its methodology.
Both info taken from engadget:
http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/20/c...xt-generation/
I've always been facinated by how hard it is to prove that an obviously dangerous thing actualy is, while "proving" that it's not seems easy as a pie.
Even a science dummy like me knows that it's just criminal to say that exposure to high frequency radiations has no major impact on ealth. Especialy regarding habits that are less than 2 decades old.
A simple goolge will educate some, or one could jump straight to
http://www.microwavenews.com/
As some article titled:
The cell phone industry= Big Tobacco 2.0
(but ok, that won't stop me from using gprs and wifi ;-p)