View Single Post
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 08-11-2005, 07:14 AM
alex_kac
Thinker
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 486

Quote:
Originally Posted by Duncan
So - you get a more power hungry version of WiFi (and more bandwidth than you need) but have the same battery size, the same absurdly low resolution (why on earth not 480 x 480?) and, in the process, lose the SD slot?

I see HP haven't got their clue back yet... :roll:
How is g more power hungry than b? They are on the same gigahertz range. Granted, I'm really not an expert on that, but I'd think they'd be the same power.

I do agree about 480x480 - EXCEPT that I can attest to the fact that high res screens SUCK power like anything, so I guess that's why. I also wish the unit had a higher battery rating, but again - its a compromise in that it would require a bigger unit.

Frankly, the 6700 is the ONLY unit I've ever seen that makes me not care so much about VGA.
 
Reply With Quote