Yes, the Wacklepedia site turned out to be not such a good idea - I had other plans for it, but it turned out to be a much bigger task than I actually had time for. Plus I notice mine is about 1 of 3000 other websites that did the same thing. Oh well, live and learn.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by OSUKid7
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by chuckayoub
I suspect this post may end up in the 'Hall of Flame and Shame...
|
Probably right. 
On another note though, what makes your Wacklepedia so good? From the few minutes I've spent on it, it looks like it just takes WiKiPedia's articles and displays it in a worse, non-editable, site. :| |